It has been said that there have been a number of highly questionable claims about pathogens. That these claims are riddled with irreconcilable errors, contradictions and inconsistencies in relation to the nature of pathogens and what they are said to do.
-Further, it doesn’t help when the scientific method with its applications has been less than precise when it comes to the study of pathogens. A number of us are well-aware that the science has at times been downright fraudulent.
Take, for instance, during the C-19 fraud heydays, Dr. Fauci told us that masking was ineffective. Then, several weeks on, he made a U-turn saying that “It’s ‘common sense’ to wear two masks instead of one…”
This U-turn was based on no scientific data! It was simply based on political whims and agendas. Well, so much for Fauci’s repeated mantra, “trust in the science.”
-Most people have no idea how deep the related deception runs: One of allopathic medicine’s most sacred cows, the assertion that pathogens exist as a potential to cause harm justifies its highly lucrative treatment model. This seriously needs questioning with all its pseudoscience.
Pathogens: Here are just 8 Questions to challenge their existence
1.Considering Louis Pasteur confessed that his germ theory paradigm was fraudulent, and viruses have been systematically refuted with proper science, doesn’t this render these pathogens non-existent?
2.Further, doesn’t this make virology redundant as this subject solely relies on the germ theory for its existence?
Evidence for the germ theory never took off. Viruses said to be the cause of various diseases have never been isolated, purified and identified. Hence, the only real thing that keeps the germ theory going with its claims in relation to so-called related pathogens is sustained fraud.
3.Are you aware of the universal lack of pin-pointing evidence to show how pathogens act as causative agents that spread in an organism (host) to bring about disease?
The same goes for disease transmission from external sources; human to human, animal to animal, or animal to human… Many readily assume the disease transmission theory without ever questioning its flaws.
4.Therefore, doesn’t this make the idea that we humans, for example, as possible prey for the predatory “invasion” of pathogens from outside sources nothing more than science fiction?
However, bribe enough “expert scientists” and they’ll gladly turn this science-fiction into science-fact!
Wikipedia says that: “Louis Pasteur’s spontaneous generation experiments illustrates that liquid nutrients are spoiled by particles in the air rather than the air itself. These results of these experiments supported the germ theory of disease.”
-Contrary to common belief this does NOT support the germ theory.
Louis Pasteur’s swan-neck experiment
Experiment 1 (above picture) shows that the flask containing nutrient broth is heated. Any bacteria present in the flask is denatured and killed off by the heat. Further, no bacteria is able to enter and grow in this closed system.
In experiment 2 and 3, post-sterilization heating, because the systems are open bacteria is able to enter by recolonizing in the nutrient broth.
Conclusion: Bacteria exists everywhere. It’s able to grow in the nutrient broth, but that’s all you can say about this little experiment. To state that this is unequivocal evidence for the germ theory is nothing more than a leap of faith!
Actually, it’s evidence for the terrain theory.
Remember Pasteur’s deathbed confession “It’s not the germs we need to worry about. It is our inner terrain.”
The trouble with the germ theory is that the nutrient broth in the above experiments is not a living organism like, for example, a human being. There is no evidence to show that pathogens can invade living organisms (host).
Instead, the evidence shows that pathogens can only invade and proliferate in an appropriate terrain:
-This appropriate terrain can be a nutrient broth open to the atmosphere, or dead and decaying tissue matter, or someone who has an acidic body through eating acid foods (junk food) long-term and frequently where self-inflicted disease can then set in. -The body has been immune compromised.
In other words, it’s got nothing to do with invading pathogens causing infection. It’s all to do with the pre-requisite; the conditions of the terrain. Only then can microorganisms invade.
Further, Pasteur failed to show that pathogens could invade a host. -His research was undisclosed and unscientific. However, his false claims fooled the world. They still do.
6.Another so-called big shot back in the day of Louis Pasteur was physician and microbiologist Robert Koch (1843-1910). He was well-known for his Koch’s postulates.
Could it be said that Koch’s postulates are scientific, reasonable and appropriate?
They state that:
1.The microorganism found in the ill but not in the healthy.
2.The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.
3.Produce same disease in host.
4.Re-isolation of microorganism.
However, not only does this fail to fulfill the germ theory, it destroys it!
Dr. Mark Bailey from his book “A Farewell to Virology” succinctly puts it:
“Whether different virologists want to entertain the validity of Koch’s postulated or not, it is simply another distraction as the postulates require the physical isolation of a microbe rather than assertions that one exists through means such as computer simulations, imaging vesicles of unknown biological function, or claiming that unpurified biological soups given to animals contain viruses.”
At its best, Koch’s postulates can only demonstrate association with pathogens, not causation.
Further, as explained by Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Koch’s postulates are non-specific. They cannot be used to isolate, confirm and identify specific pathogens.
-Don’t fall for the unscientific brazen audacious subterfuge, telling you something different to the above: There’s plenty of bad science out there folks, manipulated for someone’s power, profit and/or political gains…
7.Can’t it be said that no pathogenic microorganisms can invade or attack because the terrain is healthy?
8.Are you aware of the fake tests for so-called pathogens?
Fake tests such the HIV test, PCR, lateral flow… cannot be relied on. They are non-specific indicators. Nothing to do with what the test is supposed to be testing specifically for they produce positives (false positives) on those tested simply because of their ill-health.
Take, for example, someone with the flu, or just got over it. Because of this they will be test-positive on these tests. The tests only indicate test-positive because the individual affected has been immunocompromised through having the flu.
The immunocompromised state is not due to the effect of a specific invading pathogen either. No, it’s because they have such poor health: With devitalized bodies, or decaying tissue (terrain), only then can microorganisms invade and do their work. -As already mentioned, it’s because of the terrain.
Finally
Have a look at this insightful video where Dr. Sam Bailey interviews Jon Rappaport
As Jon Rappoport explains, pathogens have very little proof in terms of what they are said to do. The pathogen theory is a smokescreen used to hide evil agendas tied in to power, profit and political gains.
It allows corporations, politicians and other self-interests to get away with inflicting large-scale gross harms, losses of freedom… on a deceived public, using unneeded toxic medicines, political agendas, all in the name of a so-called crisis: A fake pathogen. A disease that’s never proven to exist.
Do not fear these false flag disease germ theory narratives. Having a healthy body then there is no unhealthy terrain for pathogens to do their work on you…
Our awareness of these health deceptions will not disappear as more and more people become aware of what’s really going on: They are trying to push evil agendas on us through a fake narrative in relation to pathogens. -And this playbook is wearing thin…