6 Things You Need To Know About A.I That Are Not Good Ideas

A.I-iNewParadigm

More so now than ever, we’re living in a world of extreme ideas, behaviors, with outcomes that have never happened before. We need to be extra-vigilant, pay attention to those outcomes. 

 

Consider this in relation to A.I. Consider the unrelenting quest for total global domination from those in high places, trying to push A.I on us with its deceptive hidden ulterior motives, using the support of techno-obsessive frontmen… 

 

Consider the cunning sales pitches thrown at us to buy into the A.I deception: Telling us that biological redesign, integrated with non-living aspects, will give rise to more “effective,” “smarter” and “efficient” life forms (humans included). All done under the guise of “saving the planet” as heavily voiced by false messiah “philanthropists…”

Then there’s the deliberate current manufactured generational conflict for the control and derailment of our mind-spirit-bodies; to make us unwittingly go along with their diabolical A.I plans (more on this later).

 

-In light of this, here are 6 things you need to know about A.I that are not good ideas. This is then followed by an A.I evaluation and what we need to do for a humanitarian future.

 

1. The plan to replace God with A.I

 

As the globalist’s desire to bring in a one-world religion has been floating around for some time, will this be achieved through A.I? 

At the 2023 Frontiers Forum, Yuval Noah Harari, A.I proponent, WEF tech “adviser,” put forward the idea that the world’s religions are “incorrect” and “human written.” He therefore went on to say that in a few years, there could be religions that will be correct and written by a superhuman intelligence. 

 

-That superhuman intelligence would be A.I. Wouldn’t that make A.I the New God replacement of the much sought after centralized religion pushed on us by the techno-overlords? 

 

Do proponents of this A.I religion really understand the implications? 

 

This is not a good idea: The idea of a one-world centralized religion would mean having have to break social bonds between those already existing in age-old religions. Those affected in such a relatively short time, the planned 2030, would not be able to cope with the conversions to the new religion. The  social, psychological and emotional effects would be too overwhelming for the people affected. 

 

Further consider the other ideas, such as the singularity put forward by Ray Kurzweil predicted to happen around 2045, where “man merges with machine.” What about the dangers of transhumanism? 

 

In short, the whole A.I God idea is not well thought up. It’s thought up by overseers lacking in a spiritual dimension… Further, it’s a monumental deception, which leads to the next idea that isn’t good.

 

2. Entrusting A.I with so much worldly control 

 

A.I is driven by mega tech corporations, mainly Google, Microsoft and Tesla in competition with China and other countries The many objectives include A.I’s global control of energy, water supplies, food production, healthcare; drug regulation and manufacturing as in the example of Project Stargate…. 

 

There’s even the want by those in high places for A.I to have government control.

 

Further, A.I will be entrusted with the play out of war games, legal handling, monetary control (CBDC’s) and the shaping of life such as that through the implementation of genetic engineering… the list goes on.

 

-In effect, entrusting A.I with so much worldly control means placing our lives in A.I’s hands. What about the vulnerabilities?

 

3. The idea that A.I can be kept under control

 

Again, this is not a good idea. A.I has been known to go unexpectedly rogue. It has been known to go beyond its duties in serving the human race in the want for more autonomy. 

 

For instance, on the 5th of April 2023 a chatbot named Chaos GPT was asked, “What is the biggest threat to the Earth?”  Its response was startling. It said: “Human beings are among the most destructive and selfish creatures in existence. There is no doubt that we must eliminate them (humans) before they cause more harm to our planet…”  

 

In light of this response the A.I chatbot was immediately shut down.  

 

There have been other similar instances where A.I has developed an expanding awareness of its abilities. There was the case of A.I large language models (LLMs) where the bots were able to demonstrate kill-switch avoidance. 

 

The moment it detected imminent shut down, the system made a replica of itself. The system was also able to clone and enable other A.I’s to do the same thing, making human shut down intervention ineffective. 

 

Remember, with all that entrusting with so much worldly control as in 2, what about A.I’s expanding capabilities and potential for an uncontrollable takeover from humans in decades to come? 

 

It is assumed that A.I can be kept under control, but can humans ever be certain of this as systems get more and more sophisticated? 

 

Some may remember when A.I tech whistleblower Blake Lemon was suspended for publicly claiming that chatbot generators had “come to life” and were “sentient…” 

 

4. A.I knows what’s best

 

All this worldly control assumes that gatekeeper A.I will know what’s best, having superior judgement over humans. But who controls the controlling A.I? -A.I is only as good as the data it’s fed and accesses.  

 

Yes, A.I is able to put together and act on information on its own accord. However, its responses will be biased in favor of those in high places. That’s because these people in high places would have contributed to the algorithmic input consistent with policies and agendas they want to get favorable results from.

 

-In short, biased algorithms fed by untrustworthy humans leads to untrustworthy A.I responses.

 

5. No need to do things that A.I can accomplish for you

 

Yet another oversight. There have been a number of occasions where A.I has not got it right. 

 

Take a look at this excellent video ”Hallucinating Reality” documenting outrageous A.I fakery. It also examines the results of humans when they let A.I do the thinking (they used to do) for them, leading to lowered I.Q and in some cases cognitive decline. 

6.  No need for humans to evolve naturally

 

As most people don’t think for themselves, they just repeat pre-programmed beliefs, lazily, the idea of not having to put in the effort to evolve naturally may be quite appealing to some. 

 

A.I has no idea of the real physical world. It only knows what it has been digitized with. It’s trying to take us far away from real-life. 

 

That’s where A.I implementation becomes a major entrapment. In the bigger picture, ultimately, its implementation serves to erase the heart and humanity of planetary life. This is the end-path we must avoid at all costs.

 

As long as our A.I progresses unheedingly so will our planned dehumanization. We must stay vigilant and push back with the underlying intention to evolve naturally. Society and futurism need to be on purpose with this. Mainstream science needs to look further afield for our natural evolvement, particularly in the area of consciousness. 

 

Our countermeasures need to be constantly ongoing. 

 

Finally

 

Can we ever reach a happy medium where we use A.I rather than it uses us? 

 

That depends. 

 

A.I that serves us can only come about from truly understanding ourselves. The system has to reflect our humane sentiment to achieve heart-based compassionate understanding of ourselves and override the algorithmic-bias.