When it comes to the decline in the number of deaths over the years long gone, orthodox medicine has very little to say about the contribution made by improvement in sanitation and social conditions. By leaving this out, they want you to think that vaccines are the sole lifesaver.
This was far from the truth when it came to smallpox.
We have already seen that the decline in mortality rates from this disease was due to sanitation and not vaccination. The rate in which the numbers of deaths were declining over the years between 1840 and 1920 would have been far steadier and would have probably tailed off much earlier had the smallpox vaccinations not intervened.
When it comes to the decline in the number of deaths over the years long gone, orthodox medicine has very little to say about the contribution made by improvement in sanitation and social conditions. By leaving this out, they want you to think that vaccines are the sole lifesaver.
This was far from the truth when it came to smallpox.
We have already seen that the decline in mortality rates from this disease was due to sanitation and not vaccination. The rate in which the numbers of deaths were declining over the years between 1840 and 1920 would have been far steadier and would have probably tailed off much earlier had the smallpox vaccinations not intervened.
Remember, because smallpox was the first ever disease to be vaccinated for, it led the way in principle for others.
What do we find when looking at other vaccinations used to treat other diseases?
The Statistics
For measles, tuberculosis, polio and whooping cough we can see that the decline in the number of deaths occurred way before the vaccinations. In the case of measles, the death rate was virtually over before the vaccine. For all four diseases, there was no acceleration in the decline post-vaccination.
The pattern for measles, respiratory tuberculosis, polio and whooping cough can be found in other diseases, such as diphtheria in countries besides the UK.
In conclusion, from these records there is no statistical evidence to show that vaccines are effective.
There have never been any experiments to compare those unvaccinated against a control group (with no vaccination). Big Pharma’s has declined to carry out this research, considering it to be too risky to deny their vaccines to the unvaccinated group!
The statistics and adverse effects
We can look at the statistical evidence and find examples where the vaccines can do more harm than good.
The Philippines was invaded by the USA in 1903 and forcibly taken over by a military dictatorship. By means of US medical intervention, a scourge throughout the Philippines occurred: They made smallpox vaccinations compulsory. The people of this land were healthy, care of the clean environment, natural foods, and fresh drinking water and their reluctance to be injected with shots of poison was quite understandable, especially when a single incidence of smallpox was rarely seen.
After rounding up the inhabitants from all areas and giving them the vaccine, an epidemic of smallpox soon occurred. A further series of epidemics happened, going on until the 1920’s. The US general tried to cover up this information.3 In 1918 alone; there were 47,000 cases and 16,000 smallpox deaths.
Smallpox was not the only killer as a result of the vaccine enforcement: Malaria 93,000, influenza 91,000, tuberculosis 80,000…were some of the other reported cases.
Another example of an outbreak occurring just after the vaccination programme is in the Corpus Christi school 1985, where 99% vaccinated for measles soon contracted the disease. The other 1% unvaccinated fortunate enough to avoid the regime were healthy.
In Sweden 1979, the whooping cough vaccine was discontinued and Germany did the same a few years later. In both countries there followed a significant decline in the number of cases, which continued…
“vaccination is the single most prevalent and preventable
cause of infant deaths.”
-Dr Viera Scheibner PhD, world-renowned expert in
vaccines
“One of the easiest ways to prevent cot-death is to
prevent multi- factual insults to the body; by not
vaccinating.”
-Dr Dettman
In Japan, after stopping the whooping cough vaccine in infants, cot death was virtually eliminated.
-I could make many, many more references to the counter productiveness of vaccines.
Why refuse?
You may think that It’s quite understandable to make it mandatory for medical staff to be vaccinated, since they are at risk, being in contact with diseased patients. However, there are many well-documented cases where doctors have refused to be vaccinated:
The American Medical Association conducted a study in 1994 and found that doctors followed the guidelines of a recommendation to vaccinate all children against flu. However, around a third of doctors did not carry this out on themselves.
Robert Mendelson told of a certain fellow physician in Los Angeles who did not vaccinate his own baby son against measles. Mendelson reported that this doctor refused on account of his considered inefficacy of the vaccine and fear of it being a health threat. However, he had no trouble when it came to treating his patients and convincing them that it was worth it. -This not the only time when a situation like this has occurred.
It should be noted that doctors, when reaching their target number of vaccines per deadline time period, are given cash bonuses. It has also been known that when patients refuse the jab, doctors have taken them off their list, declining further treatment.
The evidence of doctors’ refusals continues. This time, from a report by the British Medical Journal. When doctors were questioned about the hepatitis B vaccine, 86% were in favor of it being used to treat other G.P’s. However, out of the 586 questioned, only 47% had received the jab.
-So much for doctors practicing what they preach, wouldn’t you say?
In a naturopathic clinic in Edinburgh, the staff challenged six doctors: Being unvaccinated and therefore having a natural immunity, they asked the vaccinated doctors to stick with them in an isolation unit amongst smallpox patients.
-The doctors were smart enough not to take up the challenge.
A list of flaws in vaccinations
“…alien viruses, injected into the body, fuse with
healthy cells and continue to replicate along with
those cells… the immune system…can no longer
differentiate…foreign proteins…injected directly
into the bloodstream…are able to change our genetic
structure… viral vaccines…contain pure genetic
material…from a foreign organism…the new genetic
material is incorporated into the invaded cells.”
– Vaccines N. Miller
1.Is there really a rational basis for vaccination?
I have already showed you in vaccinations part one that the big daddy originator of it all, Edward Jenner, was not the savior of the world. He was a fraud. His vaccine; a poisonous cocktail of cowpox and horse grease caused a dramatic rise in smallpox cases with many, many deaths over the years that followed. You have to ask yourself, if Jenner’s principle, the original idea in which vaccination is based on is fundamentally flawed, what about other vaccinations…?
We have at least seen from the measles, tuberculosis polio and whooping cough graphs that there was no benefit from the vaccinations during these times.
The body’s physiology is designed so that the blood is kept clean by barriers such as the skin. A digestive system with an acid stomach that’s capable of killing off nasty micro-organisms. Senses of taste and smell to reject contaminated food and a vomiting reflex reaction.
To inject highly questionable poisonous and potentially lethal substances straight into the bloodstream is unnatural. Hasn’t nature constantly shown us that life is designed so that it works naturally? Why shouldn’t natural immunity be any different and allowed to take its course, with good nutrition?
And what about the dangers in unnatural immunity?
Here’s a list of some of the contents in vaccines: What about the safety?
*Aluminum – Has been linked to Alzheimer’s disease
*Antibiotics e.g. streptomycin and neomycin, to which have been known to give allergic reactions
*Bacteria – Can be incorporated into the recipient’s DNA. What about the possible health threats…?
*Bovine (calf’s) serum
*Borax – Ant killer
*Carbolic acid – A toxic industrial chemical used as a disinfectant or dye
*Disease causatives – Cultured in putrid blood with monkey’s kidney, chicken and duck embryos; dog, horse, rabbit, mouse, cow and human tissues; such as those of aborted fetuses. Some human tissue cells have known to be cancerous 13
*Formaldehyde – Used in pathology as embalming fluid. It is a potentially cancerous chemical and has been known to cause liver damage
*Formalin (formaldehyde with methanol and water) – used as a disinfectant and preservative for biological specimens
*Glycerol – Another chemical capable of producing toxic effects and subsequent damage to organs
*Hydrolysed gelatine – Extracted from animal bones
*Nail polish remover solvent – Acetone
*Phenol – See Carbolic acid
*Phenoxyethanol – Antifreeze
*Pigs pancreatic matter
*Polymyxin B
*Polysorbate 20 – Commercially also known as Tween® 20
*Polysorbate 80 – commercially also known as Tween® 80, a trademark of Uniqema/ICI 14
*Potassium diphosphate
*Potassium monophosphate
*Sorbitol, a white water-soluble crystalline alcohol having a sweet taste
*Thimerosal – Contains mercury and has been linked to brain damage
*Viral DNA – Can be incorporated into the recipient’s DNA What about the possible health threats…?
*Washed hemoglobin (red blood cells) from sheep
*Yeast – Genetically modified
-As you can see, the list includes some of the nastiest materials known to humans. Do you think that it’s a really good idea to let these things be injected into an infant? (or any adult for that matter)
What about the inherent dangers placed on a very young and developing nervous system as a consequence of vaccination?
There have been many cases where individuals have sued for damage through vaccinations. To avoid bad reputation, much of this has been kept under wraps by the establishment.
An unhealthy immune system causes disease not some virus, bacteria or other micro-organism
As I have been saying. Pay heed to the four things that make up good health:
2. …Because your wellness or immunity depends ultimately on a holistic approach, not some questionable substance injected into your blood.
Finally
Whether it’s regarding you or others, your spouse or children…When it comes to making decisions over getting vaccinated, there Doctors will be quite enthusiastic about giving vaccination because are some very important factors you should consider:
1.They receive sizeable financial rewards from the manufacturers the pharmaceutical companies for carrying them out in numbers.
2.Vaccination refusal could mean the doctor striking you off the patient list because you would affect his or her income.
3.Because the doctor has vested interest, don’t be cajoled or bullied into accepting vaccinations.
4.In light of the above, ask if the vaccine is:
a) Really needed? b) Safe enough considering the health of the person having it (no, it’s never safe enough) c) Giving any counterproductive effects to others
*If you chose to go ahead, ask the doctor to confirm to you in writing (dated and signed) that the vaccine is safe and needed.
*In addition, get the details of the vaccine used: Supplier name, production batch number…this is essential. If any nasty adverse reaction occurs, you will want all the documentary evidence you can get for court action.
*Keep a close eye on health, looking out for any abnormalities post-vaccination.