While banned in Germany, Citizen Vigilante has been a big success in the United States. It is aired on a number of popular platforms, such as X.
Without giving away any real spoilers, the basic plot goes like this: Set in current times, Michael Sanders (played by actor Arnie Hammer), the central character in Citizen Vigilante is a well-off American businessman living in Croatia. In his frustrations with the system, aware of gross injustices, Sanders takes the law into his own hands. He has become a vigilante.
He pursues an unrelenting quest to punish those responsible for violent crimes together with the crooked officials who had let these criminals walk away…
Citizen Vigilante has a number of difficult scenes to watch due to its graphic violence. The movie doesn’t last for too long before Sanders’ vigilante acts of violence escalate. He continues, however, to get public support, revered as a hero…
In a number of ways, this movie is rather like those typically depicting vigilantes. The 2014 film John Wick with Kianu Reeves and the 1970’s Death wish movies, starring Charles Bronson, have similarities.
Many are saying that the movie is a “must see.”
Essentially, it has been claimed that Citizen Vigilante mirrors and exposes real-life crimes: Numerous violent attacks, rapes and murders committed by invading migrants. It has also been said that the real-life crimes committed by these invading migrants are happening frequently all over Europe and America where they are getting away with it due to a corrupt legal system.
Put another way, the movie has been commended, as it is said to call out the inadequate responses by the police and legal justice system.
-The reason why Citizen Vigilante was banned in Germany (refused a certificate) was due to grave concerns that the movie’s protagonist could incite real-world vigilante violence on those considered to be migrant criminals.
-Will the movie shown, for example, in the United States, have this effect, stoking intemperate rage and anger leading to vengeful attacks on migrants? Is Citizen Vigilante really a dangerous movie?
Controversy
Firstly, the author does not support unlawful vigilante violence (or any other violence for that matter). Fighting violence (especially to the extreme) with violence is like trying to put out fire with gasoline. —It doesn’t work.
Further, it will only make matters worse than what they already are. It could increase the injustices from both sides: Indigenous vigilantes versus migrant criminals… What about the innocent men, women and children who could be caught up in the crossfire with this scenario? What about their protection?
What you’re not being told
While Citizen Vigilante does a good job in sending out a message, it’s still on restricted ground. The movie offers no real solutions to core-problems. It doesn’t shine a light on or address a number of major issues/concerns expressed by common-folk in the countries affected.
For instance, there’s a scene in the movie where the Citizen Vigilante protagonist Michael Sanders speaks to a judge who, through using pathetic excuses, had allowed a bunch of teens to walk away from committing the horrific crime of raping a young girl. The vigilante never asks the judge to give the real reason for letting the teens off.
What you’re not being told in the movie was the real reasons for the let off. The teens walked because of a two-tiered policing, law system. -The corrupt judge was following top-down orders/instructions from those in higher places.
These migrant crimes and injustices are deliberately allowed to go on.
No general release movie with its controlling overseers in high places would ever reveal the full truth in connection with the big picture. A number of senior politicians under the order/instruction of the world’s ruling globalists don’t want you to know that the allowing of the mass invasion of migrants is deliberately orchestrated. That’s why the politicians are choosing to turn a blind eye. In other words, they are complicit.
Mass migrant influx has the effect of destabilizing the indigenous populations of the countries affected. Further, it causes destabilization and demoralization, while breaking up cultural identities in the “divide and rule.” This has been orchestrated to happen as part of the global cult’s NWO takeover.
The manufactured scenario also allows the globalists to “justify” more mass surveillance: More totalitarian control, order out of chaos, as boundaries are breaking down…
The movie doesn’t address the right for citizens to defend themselves. If citizens were allowed to ‘bear right to arms’ as legal self-defense, then this would serve as a deterrent. -There would be less violence from migrants. The fact that this hasn’t happened duly enrages the public.
The reviews
Bearing in mind that the mainstream media is owned and controlled by the globalist overseers, it comes as no surprise to some that the puff-piece reviews of Citizen Vigilante have been bad. That’s because they don’t want you to know that the movie is sending a message regarding the orchestrated mass migration and the crimes the migrants are allowed to get away with.
On the other hand, public reviews of this movie are very good. That’s because they understand the whole thing about the migration problem and its hidden agendas.
Finally
The movie, in effect, is a psychological operation. It doesn’t tell you that encouraging the public to take the law into their own hands by becoming a vigilante is a trap. Don’t be a sucker and fall for it.
Corrupt governments with their crooked legal systems and complicit police need to be removed to stop the planned new world order agendas. Only then can justice be done.
Offending migrants need to be duly convicted or deported.