As we go into 2026, there is a growing legislative push for state sanctioned euthanasia. Not only in Canada or Holland with their assisted suicide programs, but also in other countries.
For example, the UK has been pushing for a “doctor assisted suicide” program. Unfortunately, this program recently passed in parliament by the skin of its teeth, approved by a number of clueless M.P’s having no idea of what’s really going on. No idea of the real hidden ulterior motives behind the euthanasia legal killing agenda.
On the surface, it looks like the euthanasia “assisted dying” program is about patient choice or granting dignity. In other words, in rare cases the painless killing of patients will be used because of their chronic pain condition through incurable disease or other irreversible ill-health severities.
-However, the above is grossly misleading. Those who have bought into it, such as the above-mentioned UK M.P’s don’t realize that it doesn’t end there. It’s not just about these rare cases. There is something sinister at work here, having hidden ulterior motives, tied into the globalist’s world depopulation agenda. Let me explain.
Mission creep
The compassionate healthcare “assisted dying” program, a last resort treatment for rare cases, will be used as a cover arm.
As an administrative platform it will be modified to extend its use. As a state-run operation it will quietly go on to expand its criteria to include those who are regarded by the state as an “incumbrance.” In its overreach, it will be used to systematically eliminate the elderly, those in extreme poverty, the jobless and anyone else considered unwanted.
-Is it a quiet road map to full-blown eugenics?
It has been said that the mission creep, extending the criteria for euthanasia with eugenics in mind, has already began in Canada and Holland.
Take the case of Canada with their MAiD (Medical Assistance in Dying) system.
*MAiD began in 2016 as system. Its use was deemed legally justifiable when a patient’s natural death was “reasonably foreseeable.”
*MAiD then expanded to include “grievous and irremediable” illnesses. That broadened patient treatment criteria, as the circumstances were now more open to interpretation.
*The program then went on to include disabled non-fatality patients, the chronically ill and those unable to live an independent life.
*As further expansion, there are plans for those with mental disabilities to have the Canadian MAiD system available. -Young children are also planned to be on this list.
*Euthanizing prisoners has already begun in Canada.
*The above criteria suggests that those in extreme poverty, the unemployable, old people or the isolated (no support) could be eligible for the MAiD system. -As the criteria broadens, is it only a matter of time for these individuals to be included in this mission creep model?
Attestations
There have been a number of attestations regarding the extent to which MAiD is expanding. Here are some examples:
*Veterans have gone on record telling us that they have been given the choice of euthanasia while there was no mention of offering adaptive support to help with their disability.
*On similar lines, disabled individuals unable to safeguard themselves through reliable housing or support have considered assisted suicide to avoid the otherwise undignified hardships they would suffer.
*Instead of treating long-term mental disability problems or eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa, these patients were told to consider the MAiD system, the alternative to what they should be given, compassionate healthcare.
-There are other attestations in different circumstances.
The slippery slope further MAiD expansions
Originally, it was a last resort treatment for rare cases. Well, so much for that now. The medical establishment bureaucrats are even considering using euthanasia as a way to save money on treatment costs, especially in cash-strapped situations.
Further, the Canadian government is pushing for pre-approved euthanasia. That is, patients could be signing up for their termination by lethal injection before they become seriously ill; too incapacitated to make judgements.
As the MAiD system further expands, consider how vulnerable some people could be: How many could be persuaded or coerced into accepting euthanasia? -For example, there have been a number stories floating around from families claiming that hospital staff had pressured them to put a “Do Not Resuscitate” sign over their elderly loved one’s bed.
Not only has the criteria expanded, but also more and more countries are in line for an assisted dying program. Yes, it has world-wide implications.
Belgium, for instance, has gone along with the euthanasia agenda, extending its procedure on those with learning disabilities, the autistic, children, and for a number of psychiatric disorders.
Unreliable system
Note the lethal medical assistance is not always the quick, peaceful, painless killing it’s been made out to be. The fact that there have been complications makes the system unreliable. There have been cases whereby those who had been given the lethal treatment did not die easily. Some had suffered terribly before death, taking hours or even days before their lives finally ended.
There are other more efficient ways to put an end to life such as by shooting, but it’s unlikely that this will ever happen. With a view to maintaining their image the politicians overseeing the laws for legal killing, would probably not allow this methodology. They fear that their image would be tarnished: The public would consider shooting too barbaric or hash and the politicians would be held accountable or made unpopular for allowing this to happen.
In other words, the politicians would rather preserve their image as overseers of the current assisted dying procedure as a “peaceful death.” -As Dr. Vernon Coleman implies, “it’s not about mercy killing, but optics.”
Organ donation from MAiD victims
Research from the Journal of Hepatology (October 26th, 2025) posits that liver transplants from euthanasia (MAiD) donors are quite successful. They are generally as successful as liver transplants from conventional donors.
-Therein lies a problem.
What about the people who had been persuaded or even coerced into accepting euthanasia by those having the ulterior motive to profit from selling their donor organs by putting them on the market where there is a shortage?
There are ethical implications, such as the commodification of life. Some have gone further, saying that organ harvesting practices could blur the line between euthanasia and murder.
Population reduction
Those of you in the know well and truly realize that the globalists want world depopulation reduction. As already mentioned, the systematic killing through euthanasia suggests that it’s part of the globalist’s world depopulation agenda. -Getting rid of the “excess” population…
As evidence for this, consider what’s going on in Canada could well happen with other countries. -That could elevate the medical establishment to whole new level of criminality.
Records indicate that in Canada there were some 13,000 euthanasia (MAiD) deaths reported in 2022, almost a 33% rise in comparison to 2022. -The fact that that has not been reported in this country as one of the top 10 leading causes of death suggests deliberate underreporting. Consider the implications for this said act of omission.
Finally
If you think that the idea of tying euthanasia into global depopulation is far-fetched, then think twice.
In Scotland, already there’s talk of making it illegal for anyone to oppose the medical establishment’s decision to apply euthanasia.
In view of this, now is the time speak up with your objections before it’s too late.