For many, many years corporate/government owned and controlled sponsored media has successfully managed to deceive the public into believing certain untruths to be true. Whether it’s through their owned and controlled TV, radio or newspapers … the manipulation of public perception has been the key to getting the sleeping masses to believe almost anything: The 3 P’s; power, political gain and profit are the reasons for this, the hidden ulterior motives
In recent years with the coming of the internet the corporate/government owner controllers are indeed having difficulty in deceiving the public with their media untruths and keeping the lid on their hidden ulterior motives. Thanks to the steady rise in alternative media sites exposing the deceptions people are slowly waking up and seeing the ‘big picture’ as to what’s really going on in the world.
However, to counter this, the controllers continue to unleash certain disinformation tactics on the public. Many of these perfidious tactics come from so-called debunkers that make it look as if their viewpoint on certain subject matter is very convincing. It therefore attempts to deceive the public into believing what’s said is true and stop them from making further enquiries and seeing right through the holes in the plot…
One way of doing this in recent times is through the use of the MAM (Alternative Mainstream Media). The MAM has been used to deceive those who are slanted towards the alternative media; the more critical thinker not accepting the official narrative as truth.
However, the MAM, in effect, is there to misinform and ultimately lead the more critical thinking individual in a direction that really doesn’t serve to tell the truth or report things that really matter. MAM is misdirection, just like the way magicians operate…
-MAM is the globalists way of trying to confuse you with the truthful alternative media.
I wholeheartedly encourage healthy skepticism and enquiry.
However, there are certain types of skeptics that are unhealthy in that they only enquire into subjects to maintain their point of view, keeping it ridged and fixed. Also, unhealthy skeptics only challenge fringe subjects.
The controllers have employed these individuals to infiltrate certain major knowledge-based websites to put out their ridged and fixed point of view which serves as disinformation tactics for the hidden controllers’ agenda.
I believe these disinformation tactics manage to deceive some, but in the long-term the truth will eventually find its way with the majority…
Anyway, here are 8 of those disinformation tactics.
Let’s say a mainstream media discussion or debate is aired. The discussion or debate is only limited to certain areas of the subject. However, this gives the illusion that all the main points are covered and anything else, any alternative views, are either apparently unimportant or not worth pursuing.
As an example, let’s say you have someone with innovative alternative views, an inventor with potentially humanity contributing ideas. Because these ideas, if actualized, would undercut the corporate controllers’ major businesses then the innovator has to be stopped:
So the controllers together with so-called debunkers and skeptics ‘throw mud’ on the inventor as an attempt to stop the inventor’s project from getting recognition.
‘Throwing mud’ disinformation tactics include:
a. Using the above point 1 for deliberate invalidation, even when knowing the invention works.
b. Casting personal slurs on the inventor.
Like, for example, criticizing the fact that the inventor is unqualified in the subject area, even when it doesn’t matter: Whether it comes from a 12 year old schoolboy or lifetime professor, facts are facts, and the inventor actually knows a lot related to his work…
c. Hardly ever or even never talking ‘nuts and bolts’ regarding the inventor’s ideas.
This disinformation tactic involves the above deception; manipulating and relying on the masses with their general ignorance and unwillingness to enquire into anything of real importance that would expose the debunkers and skeptics flaws….
This is a favorite with education and media. For example, certain words or phrases serve to program the masses into untruths…
Deliberately putting out ridiculous statements; publicly claiming that there are those who believe these things. The effect is to cast a slur on a particular group, but they (the group), don’t actually believe it!
For example, I heard a ridiculous statement the other day said by the so-called debunkers/skeptics that there are those into natural health who believe that coconut oil cures cancer.
No natural health expert believes this… but in line with misinformation tactic 3 (above), some of the ignorant masses will accept that they do, and therefore the disinformation has worked in invalidating natural health and its advocates.
The controllers know natural health is an effective way to fight illness, but is a threat because it is cheap and can undercut their medical/pharmaceutical business.
There are certain well-known information websites that have for many years taken the neutral viewpoint, but in recent years have become more and more secretly infiltrated by debunkers and skeptics with indeed ulterior motives. Like, for example, infiltration into the Tesla society.
All in all
The point of me writing this is to help you the reader to learn to discern disinformation from truth. Learn that the controllers with their so-called debunkers and ‘skeptics’ have a game going here and truth has been overridden by power, political gain and profit and if not recognized you could become a victim.
Don’t be fooled by those false invalidations and phony ‘points of view.’